Research in the Round Evaluation Criteria
The evaluators reviewing Research in the Round proposal submissions will be given the following criteria as guidelines:
Content Including Originality: Does the Research in the Round proposal have a clear focus? Is the topic or structure a fresh and original approach? Does it focus on either the common reader or the convention theme?
Audience Participation: To what extent does the Research in the Round proposal lend itself to audience participation? Will its topic appeal to a wide number of students from different college programs?
Structure: Is the Research in the Round proposal well organized? Are its questions well-worded and easily understandable to student members?
Research: Does the Research in the Round proposal appear to have a solid grounding in scholarship and does it contain any sources/works cited? Do the sources seem credible and relevant to the content?
Questions
Email 2023 Convention staff at [email protected] with questions.