Home / Submissions / Research in the Round – Evaluation Criteria
Research in the Round — Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation rubric for RITR proposals. Reviewers look for in-progress research that benefits from focused peer discussion.
RITR proposals are evaluated on the strength of the research question, the readiness of the work for discussion (not a finished paper — a question that has shape), the Table Host’s clarity about what they want from the conversation, and the inclusivity of the reading recommendations.